Current:Home > ScamsAppeals court halts order barring Biden administration communications with social media companies -GrowthSphere Strategies
Appeals court halts order barring Biden administration communications with social media companies
View
Date:2025-04-15 10:05:49
Washington — A federal appeals court on Friday temporarily paused a lower court order that limited communications between top Biden administration officials and social media companies about content posted to their platforms.
The three-judge panel for the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals granted the Justice Department's request to put on hold the July 4 preliminary injunction from U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty while legal proceedings continue. It also agreed to expedite the administration's appeal.
The temporary administrative stay will remain in place "until further orders of the court," according to the brief order.
The Justice Department turned to the 5th Circuit for relief after it asked Doughy last week to halt his own order while it pursued an appeal. Doughty, appointed by former President Donald Trump, declined to do so, and in a 13-page ruling rejected the government's assertions that his injunction swept too broadly and threatened to chill lawful conduct.
"Although this Preliminary Injunction involves numerous agencies, it is not as broad as it appears," Doughty wrote. "It only prohibits something the Defendants have no legal right to do — contacting social media companies for the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner, the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech posted on social-media platforms."
The judge reiterated that he believes Missouri and Louisiana, who sued the government last year over federal officials' communications with social media companies during the COVID-19 pandemic and 2020 election cycle, are likely to succeed on the merits of their case.
The states "are likely to prove that all of the enjoined defendants coerced, significantly encouraged, and/or jointly participated [with] social-media companies to suppress social-media posts by American citizens that expressed opinions that were anti-COVID-19 vaccines, anti-COVID-19 lockdowns, posts that delegitimized or questioned the results of the 2020 election, and other content not subject to any exception to the First Amendment," he wrote. "These items are protected free speech and were seemingly censored because of the viewpoints they expressed."
The judge's July 4 injunction blocks top Biden administration officials from communicating with social-media companies "for the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech posted" on their platforms.
Among those covered by the injunction are Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra, Surgeon General Vivek Murthy and White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre, as well as several federal agencies.
The order contains several carve-outs, including allowing the Biden administration to inform social media companies of posts involving criminal activity, threats to national security and public safety, and illegal efforts to suppress voting or of foreign attempts to influence elections.
In its request that the injunction be halted, the Justice Department warned that it swept too broadly and is unclear as to what conduct is allowed and who is covered.
The injunction, administration lawyers said, "may be read to prevent the Government from engaging in a vast range of lawful and responsible conduct — including speaking on matters of public concern and working with social media companies on initiatives to prevent grave harm to the American people and our democratic processes."
The lawsuit brought by the attorneys general of Missouri and Louisiana, as well as several individuals, alleges that senior government officials colluded with social-media companies to suppress viewpoints and content on social media platforms, violating the First Amendment.
Their suit accused platforms like Twitter and Facebook of censoring a New York Post story about the contents of a laptop owned by Hunter Biden, Mr. Biden's son, posts about the origins of COVID-19 and various mitigation measures implemented during the pandemic and speech about the integrity of the 2020 presidential election.
- In:
- Biden Administration
- Social Media
veryGood! (85)
Related
- The company planning a successor to Concorde makes its first supersonic test
- Satire publication The Onion buys Alex Jones’ Infowars at auction with help from Sandy Hook families
- Diamond Sports Group can emerge out of bankruptcy after having reorganization plan approved
- Smithfield agrees to pay $2 million to resolve child labor allegations at Minnesota meat plant
- Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
- West Virginia expands education savings account program for military families
- Mike Tyson is expected to honor late daughter during Jake Paul fight. Here's how.
- Hurricane-stricken Tampa Bay Rays to play 2025 season at Yankees’ spring training field in Tampa
- Which apps offer encrypted messaging? How to switch and what to know after feds’ warning
- Eva Longoria Shares She and Her Family Have Moved Out of the United States
Ranking
- Trump suggestion that Egypt, Jordan absorb Palestinians from Gaza draws rejections, confusion
- 'Serial swatter': 18-year-old pleads guilty to making nearly 400 bomb threats, mass shooting calls
- High-scoring night in NBA: Giannis Antetokounmpo explodes for 59, Victor Wembanyama for 50
- Inter Miami's MLS playoff failure sets stage for Messi's last act, Alexi Lalas says
- Don't let hackers fool you with a 'scam
- Texas man accused of supporting ISIS charged in federal court
- Mean Girls’ Lacey Chabert Details “Full Circle” Reunion With Lindsay Lohan and Amanda Seyfried
- Could trad wives, influencers have sparked the red wave among female voters?
Recommendation
Appeals court scraps Nasdaq boardroom diversity rules in latest DEI setback
UFC 309: Jon Jones vs. Stipe Miocic fight card, odds, how to watch, date
New York nursing home operator accused of neglect settles with state for $45M
In an AP interview, the next Los Angeles DA says he’ll go after low-level nonviolent crimes
Who are the most valuable sports franchises? Forbes releases new list of top 50 teams
Jamie Lee Curtis and Don Lemon quit X, formerly Twitter: 'Time for me to leave'
Mississippi expects only a small growth in state budget
Jake Paul's only loss led him to retool the team preparing him to face Mike Tyson